پانسمان فوم چسبدار پاشنه مپی لکس مونلیکه

منابع | References

1. Santamaria N, et al. Clinical effectiveness of a silicone foam dressing for the prevention of heel pressure ulcers in critically ill patients: Border II Trial. J Wound Care. 2015;24(8):340-345.
2. Tayyib N, et al. Effectiveness of pressure ulcer prevention strategies for adult patients in intensive care units: a systematic review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2016;13(6):432-444.
3. Levy A, et al. The biomechanical efficacy of dressings in preventing heel ulcers. J Tissue Viability. 2015;24(1) :1-11.
4. World Union of Wound Healing Societies (WUWHS). Consensus Document: Role of dressings in pressure ulcer prevention. London, UK: Wounds Int; 2016.
5. Molnlycke Health Care. Verification test of new heel shape. Report no. 20170221-007. 21 February 2017. Data on file. Mepilex Border Heel
6. Molnlycke Health Care. External test Lab report id SMTL 00/1278/01,00/1235/01, 21 September 2000. Data on file. Mepilex Border
7. Molnlycke Health Care. Design verification PUP16. Report no. 20170515-002. 15 May 2017. Data on file. Mepilex Border Sacrum
8. Woo K, Coutts P.M., Price P, Harding K, Sibbald R.G. A randomised crossover investigation of pain at dressing change comparing 2 foam dressings Advances in Skin and Wound Care 2009;22(7):304-310.
9. Davies, P. User evaluation of interface dressings for pressure ulcer prevention. Mölnlycke Health Care (GMCS-2017-058). 18 April 2017. Data on file.
10. Meaume, S., Van De Looverbosch, D., Heyman, H., Romanelli, M., Ciangherotti, A., Charpin, S. S. A study to compare a new self-adherent soft silicone dressing with a self-adherent polymer dressing in stage II pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Management 2003;49(9):44-52.
11. White R. A multinational survey of the assessment of pain when removing dressings. Wounds UK. 4 (1). 2008.