پانسمان فوم مپیلکس ترانسفر مونلیکه

Soft silicone exudate transfer dressing

FOAM EXUDATE TRANSFER DRESSING

Mepilex Transfer is a highly conformable dressing that transfers exudate and, in combination with appropriate secondary dressing, maintains a moist wound environment and minimises the risk for maceration. The dressing has a Safetac® wound contact layer that is a unique adhesive technology.
It minimises pain to patients and trauma to wounds and the surrounding skin at dressing removal.

منابع | References

1. Kaartinen IS, Kuokkanen HO. Suprathel® causes less bleeding and scarring than Mepilex® transfer in the treatment of donor sites of split-thickness skin grafts. Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery. 2011;45(4-5):200-3
2. Yuen W, Huizinga J, Jonkman M. Punch grafting of chronic ulcers in patients with laminin 332 deficient nhJEB. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013(68):93-7
3. Mölnlycke Health Care. Data on File. 2018.
4. Van Overschelde P, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing two wound dressings used after elective hip and knee arthroplasty. Poster presentation at the 5th Congress of WUWHS, Florence, Italy, 25-29 Sep, 2016.
5. Silverstein P, et al. An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, performance, tolerance, and safety of a silver-containing soft silicone foam dressing (intervention) vs silver sulfadiazine cream. J Burn Care Res. 2011;32(6):617-626.
6. Gee Kee EL, et al. Randomized controlled trial of three burns dressings for partial thickness burns in children. Burns. 2015;41(5):946-955.
7. David F. et al. A randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing the performance of a soft silicone-coated wound contact layer (Mepitel One) with a lipidocolloid wound contact layer (UrgoTul) in the treatment of acute wounds. International Wound Journal, 2017.
8. Patton ML, et al. An open, prospective, randomized pilot investigation evaluating pain with the use of a soft silicone wound contact layer vs bridal veil and staples on split thickness skin grafts as a primary dressing. J Burn Care Res. 2013;34(6):674-681.
9. Bredow J. et al. Evaluation of Absorbent Versus Conventional Wound Dressing. A Randomized Controlled Study in Orthopedic Surgery. Deutsche Arzteblatt Intternational, 2018.
10. Meaume S, et al. A study to compare a new self-adherent soft silicone dressing with a self-adherent polymer dressing in stage II pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2003;49(9):44-51.
11. Gotschall CS, et al. Prospective, randomized study of the efficacy of Mepitel on children with partial-thickness scalds. J Burn Care and Rehabil. 1998;19(4):279-283.
12. Schwieger-Briel A, Kiritsi D, Schempp C, Has C, Schumann H. Betulin-based oleogel to improve wound healing in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: A prospective controlled proof-of-concept study. Dermatology Research and Practice. 2017;2017